eBook Ð The Later Roman Empire Paperback µ reflectionslisburnltd

doc ´ The Later Roman Empire ☆ Averil Cameron

doc ´ The Later Roman Empire ☆ Averil Cameron AD 284 desperately needed the radical restructuring he gave its government and defenses His successor Constantine continued the revolution by adopting for himself and the Empire a vibrant new religion Christianity The fourth century is an era of wide cultural diversity represented by figures as different as Julian the Apostate and St Augustine Cameron provides a vivid narrative of its events and explores central uestions about the economy social structure urban life and cultural This is by far the strongest of the three books that I've read in the series the others being The Roman Republic and The Roman Empire I found it clear readable and informative Cameron does an excellent job showing the declining role of the Senate and the growing political role of the army She also shows how and the Emperors and other figures came to be found outside of Rome

mobi The Later Roman Empire

eBook Ð The Later Roman Empire Paperback µ reflectionslisburnltd ✓ Marked by the shift of power from Rome to Constantinople and the Christianization of the Empire this pivotal era reuires a narrative and interpretative history of its own Averil Cameron an authority on later Roman and early Byzantine his Multiplicity of the extended empire Examining the transformation of the Roman world into a Christian culture she takes note of the competition between Christianity and Neoplatonism And she paints a lively picture of the new imperial city of Constantinople By combining literary artistic and archaeological evidence Cameron has produced an exciting record of social change The Later Roman Empire is a compelling guide for anyone interested in the cultural development of late antiuity Cameron states in her preface that there is no basic text in English on the later Roman empire and that she wrote this work to fill that gap I believe it fits that description very well Based on her intent the book ranges from the end of the 3rd century to the early fifth century AD and manages to frame the period in a way that while broad gives the reader a firm grasp of major trends in politics economics culture and military developments Each chapter summarizes the state of scholarship for that particular area and also presents the primary and major secondary sources which serve as a basis for her conclusions Cameron also includes a fairly robust bibliography separated by chapter which provides a good place to start for further inuiry While it was difficult to tease many concrete conclusions from her narrative this is a textbook as she stated in her preface and textbooks walk a fine line between presenting information and breaking new scholarly ground Overall this is a good broad overview of issues and trends in late antiuity and an ideal starting place for those who wish to read deeply on the period

Averil Cameron ☆ The Later Roman Empire book

The Later Roman EmpireMarked by the shift of power from Rome to Constantinople and the Christianization of the Empire this pivotal era reuires a narrative and interpretative history of its own Averil Cameron an authority on later Roman and early Byzantine history and culture captures the vigor and variety of the fourth century doing full justice to the enormous explosion of recent scholarshipAfter a hundred years of political turmoil civil war and invasion the Roman Empire that Diocletian inherited in Short introductions to a historical time period all tend to suffer from similar handicaps For one the brevity of the discussion forces a deplorable dependency on narrative For another nuance must necessarily be cast by the wayside The result? These types of books usually just beg uestions than they answer which is probably not only exactly what they're meant to do but is fact a good thing Students need to start somewhere Except Cameron finds a way to make her short introduction even useless in this regard The problem with Cameron's book is she tries to not only avoid historical narrative but also to introduce a semblance of nuanced understanding frankly an impossible no aggravating proposition The result is a convoluted mishmash of apparent contradictions and intellectual waffling Late Antiuity is even muddier than before Constantly tempering her claims and tempering the claims of her colleagues left me thinking she didn't actually take a position on anything whatsoever She falls into exactly the same trap that has ensnared so many historians before her trying to achieve a level of value free historical objectivity So which is it were there economic dislocations in the 3rd century that though slightly alleviated by the relative stability after Diocletian were nonetheless never properly addressed if not exacerbated by imperial policy or were there only mild dislocations that though not resolved were nonetheless not uite as bad and as widespread as other historians would make us think? From the introduction I think she's arguing the latter but then sprinkled throughout the book are allusions suggesting it's the former Were the coloni gradually tied to the land en masse via legislative strictures or were the legislative strictures a sign that the coloni couldn't be tied down to the land and as such we should assume they weren't? Perhaps I myself am simply not nuanced enough to penetrate Cameron's own subtlety and the answers can be culled from somewhere in Cameron's proseCombine these problems with the fact that she's clearly engaging in debates with other people in her field re things such as the economic and social landscape during and after the Diocletianic and Constantinian reforms but doing it in what's supposed to be a short overview of the period in other words trying to say in a 10 page chapter what should be said in 100 pages She makes claims contrary to those made by such luminaries as Peter Brown without so much as a feint at real argumentation I know a little about the debates in the field so I could at least kind of following her lines of argument but for someone just trying to get a sense of the whole weird thing called Late Antiuity I'm sure it's a head scratcherShe tries to solve the fundamental problem of short historical introductions and only causes new ones She should stick with writing tomes and leave the pop stuff to amateurs