FREE DOWNLOAD The Planet Remade: How Geoengineering Could Change the World 109

Oliver Morton ↠ 9 FREE DOWNLOAD

FREE DOWNLOAD The Planet Remade: How Geoengineering Could Change the World 109 ☆ The risks of global warming are pressing and potentially vast The difficulty of doing without fossil fuels is daunting possibly even insurmountable So there is an urgent need to rethink our responses to the crisis To meet that need Of us realize Appreciating those changes clarifies not just the scale of what needs to be done about global warming but also our relationship to natureClimate change is not just one of the twenty first century's defining political challenges Morton untangles the implications of our failure to meet the challenge of climate change and reintroduces the hope that we might He addresses the deep fear that comes with seeing humans as a force of nature and asks what it might mean and what it might reuire of us to try and use that force for go. Morton begins the book with two uestions 1 Do you think human emissions of carbon dioxide are changing Earth's climate 2 Do you think it will be difficult to transition away from the centuries long and multi trillion dollar reliance on fossil fuels If your answer is yes and yes then it may be necessary to embark on some form of geoengineering the deliberate introduction of most likely sulfur aerosols into the stratosphere to reflect light into space and counter the greenhouse effectMorton is a professional science writer and he has a keen grasp of good analogies to describe the flows of energy through the upper surface of Earth and the scientific discoveries that lead to theories of geoengineering Major volcanic eruptions in the late 90s offered a case to test the assumptions of primitive climate models against the introduction of bulk surfer aerosols with sudden cooling and associated hemispheric changes in the weather Of course climate models are relatively crude and there's still much that we don't know about the effects on weather which is what people notice and care about rather than the climate The ease of geoengineering is stark Perhaps 10 billion to set up a fleet of stratospheric tankers and a 2 billion annually to maintain the program Big science yes but costs on the order of a few large nuclear plantsThe problem with geoengineering is it's Promethean potential It's not that the actual practice is wholly new Climate change is just one natural cycle now substantially influence to completely dominated by human activity from the Haber Bosch process and nitrogen fertilizer to phosphorus fertilizer to the narrowly averted disaster of CFCs and the ozone layers To take a major Earth system deliberately in hand and say this is what we want it to be is a new level of planetary ambition Geonegineering induced cooling will have some losers and the politics of those harms are not well mapped outThis is where Morton falls short He imagines a scenarios where a Concord of minor states threatened by climate change enact geoengineering but it seems likely that a major power or even a billionaire operating under a flag of convenience will get there first The internal politics of geoengineering its scientific debates and relationship to mainstream atmospheric physics and ecological activism are sorely under reported Still I can't think of a better book on the topic

CHARACTERS Ô E-book, or Kindle E-pub ↠ Oliver Morton

The risks of global warming are pressing and potentially vast The difficulty of doing without fossil fuels is daunting possibly even insurmountable So there is an urgent need to rethink our responses to the crisis To meet that need a small but increasingly influential group of scientists is exploring proposals for planned human intervention in the climate system a stratospheric veil against the sun the cultivation of photosynthetic plankton fleets of unmanned ships seeding the clouds These are the technologies of geoengineerin and as O. Mankind has spent millennia altering and changing their local environment but with the discovery of fossil fuels and our current addiction to them we have begun the process of changing the entire global climate He explores the effect we have had on our world with carbon dioxide nitrogen fertilisers and sulphate in the atmosphere and considers the perilous situation that the world could be in just a few years Even though some choose to ignore it climate change is the thing that isn’t going to go awayA need to address the risks of global warming is urgent and pressing A small group of scientists are looking at proposals such as cultivation of photosynthetic plankton or a stratospheric veil against the sun or having automated robotic ships cloud seeding for intervention against the effect of climate change In this book Morton seeks to inform us about the benefits and hazards of these geoengineering strategies Even trying to change things in a positive way is fraught with danger but inaction holds eual dangersMorton has drawn together a broad overview on the coming threats of climate change and the possibilities that geoengineering offers in digging us out of the mire It does make for interesting reading the discussion of the technologies available to reduce carbon emissions and reflect sunlight back into space While he covers various new technologies and new ways that are being considered to combat this he didn’t seem to be bold enough to commit to the one he would recommend Overall this isn’t a bad book but didn’t seem to have the focus that I was expecting but then that might be because the solution might be as dangerous as the problem 25 stars

REVIEW The Planet Remade: How Geoengineering Could Change the World

The Planet Remade How Geoengineering Could Change the WorldLiver Morton argues in this visionary book it would be as irresponsible to ignore them as it would be foolish to see them as a simple solution to the problemThe Planet Remade explores the history politics and cutting edge science of geoengineering Morton weighs both the promise and perils of these controversial strategies and puts them in the broadest possible context The past century's changes to the planet to the clouds and the soils to the winds and the seas to the great cycles of nitrogen and carbon have been far profound than most. Morton begins his synopsis of the possibilities of geoengineering by establishing the necessity of it He begins with two uestions do you think climate change is bad enough to do something about it do you think reducing emissions enough is very hard to do maybe impossible He answers yes to both uestions and says that most of today's politicans and environmentalists today answer no to one of these uestions and yes to the other depending on their political leanings But he says if we need to do something about climate change and emissions reductions are not enough we have to look at geoengineeringThe primary action he examines is injecting aerosols into the stratosphere That would in effect shade us a bit so that we can have high carbon dioxide levels but not so much heating He's definitely a cheerleader for this but he's aware of the objections that have been or will be raised as this possibility works its way into the mainstream discussion about climate changeHe includes a wide ranging historical analysis of how humans have changed the climate both intentionally or considered doing it intentionally and unintentionally This discussion was wide and detailed enough that he lost my interest a couple times but I'll credit him with being thorough And he does make his point We are now and have been for at least a few decades if not centuries influential enough to change climate on a geologically noticeable scaleHe doesn't side step the fear that intentionally changing the climate excites in most people He addresses objections one by one in a or less fair manner He makes other forms of geoengineering such as pulling CO2 out of the air and storing it or seeding the ocean with nutrients to seuester CO2 that way seem interesting but insufficient In the latter case it may even hurt the cause And one of the biggest objections is that people may think that spreading sulfates as a shield would mean that we don't then need to reduce emissions that's absolutely false we still would and he clearly states that over and over So on the whole I thought he presented a responsible picture of the possibilities and risks of trying to construct our own climateIn the end I'm not as enthusiastic about geoengineering as Morton is but I'm thankful for the well researched well written book and I walk away informed and open minded than when I started That's a good outcome for any book on the topic I would think I got a free copy of this from Net Galley